February 4th, 2020

R.H. Quaytman at Museum Sztuki

Artist: R.H. Quaytman

Venue: Museum Sztuki, Łódź

Exhibition Title: The Sun Does Not move. Chapter 35

Curated By: Jarosław Suchan

Selected By: Big Apple Circus

Date: November 8 – February 23, 2020

Note: A publication designed by the artist is available here.

Click here to view slideshow

Full gallery of images, press release, and link available after the jump.


Images courtesy of Museum Sztuki, Łódź. Photos by HaWa.

Press Release:

If I ignored the urge to explain everything what would I say? The Sun Does Not Move might be something these paintings would say if they had speech bubbles. Those words, when I read them somewhere else expressed what I felt painting them this year. Not only because of a political swing to something that I innocently hoped over but also because it reflects these paintings’ beginnings in The Sun. Chapter 1. I needed to orient myself to begin the book and fate put me down here in 1999 at the moment of my rock bottom desperation about what to do as a painter. This small industrial Polish town – its name Łódź, scarred, scratched and nothing like it sounds – and its artists. Kobro especially is embedded in all my geometry and installation choreography. From her I found a structure but Strzemiński, he tackled another problem – one she seemed disinterested in – the paint. The wet sloppy dripping problem of brushes with paint on them and how it’s always already been painted – of heavy matter and our eyes that precede us and see it before us because they know when to see and they know when to forget an afterimage.

R. H. Quaytman, October 14, 1940*

*/ On this day the artist’s Łódź-born grandfather and his father-in-law lost their lives in an accident [Editor’s note].

The work of R. H. Quaytman is an attempt to redefine painting in a world dominated by digital images that are immaterial and freely floating across time and space. Combining painting and photographic techniques, R. H. Quaytman proposes that the perceived image is, on the one hand, a visual, abstract, information medium, and on the other hand, a thing that has a real existence in the spectators body and in space. Quaytman’s distinctive installation practice furthers these tensions and raises the following questions: what is the relationship between image and meaning, what is the relationship between painting and materiality, and what is the impact of this materiality both on human perception and on the image itself.

Since 2001, R. H. Quaytman has divided successive exhibitions into “chapters.” Usually these chapters consist of entirely new works. This chapter, however, is different, in that it combines new work made for Łódź and the Muzeum Sztuki together with carefully selected paintings from earlier chapters that the artist felt were important in understanding what or where the ongoing narrative of the work may be leading.

Each chapter is site-specific in nature, responding to the architectural, institutional, and historical context of its place. Their accumulation comprises a kind of book or diary that records successive artistic and intellectual meetings—a pilgrimage of sorts—inspired by the specificity of place and its art historical relevance. A reflection on the nature of the image, its relationship to reality, the flow of visual information, and last but not least, how images shape both knowledge and complicity in our world is therefore always personal and bound to a specific point on the spatiotemporal trajectory of life.

Łódź occupies a special place in this personal story. The first three chapters were largely based on material researched by the artist during a trip here, first in 1999 and then again in 2004. More importantly, the work of Katarzyna Kobro and Władysław Strzemiński, closely intertwined with the city, became for Quaytman a cue that helped to orient artistic investigations. Kobro, taught Quaytman that a painting need not necessarily be viewed as an autonomous, isolated piece, but rather an element of complex spatial structuring that organizes the spectator’s visual and corporeal experience. Strzemiński’s unism, in turn, strongly influenced the artist to privilege the paintings opticality and materiality, also the golden-section principle, which Quaytman applied to the proportions of the paintings, is borrowed from the practice of the Avant-Garde Polish duo.

Produced specially for the exhibition at the Muzeum Sztuki in Łódź, The Sun Does Not Move. Chapter 35 is in many ways retrospective in nature. The Sun Does Not Move alludes to the first chapter, The Sun. That chapter was based on the history of the artist’s grandfather, Mark Quaytman, a Jewish emigrant from Łódź, to New York’s Lower East Side at the turn of the century. Photographs taken by the artist during a train trip to Łódź, and an article from the New York Sun about her grandfather’s death in a train crash became an impulse for her to reflect on the special nature of images showing places where something once existed but keep moving by us like train cars or paintings in an exhibition.

Besides works alluding to that story, The Sun Does Not Move reactivates paintings from other Łódź-related chapters and from those produced in recent years. Consequently, it features references both to Kobro’s sculptures and Strzemiński’s optical concepts as well as Paul Klee’s Angelus Novus (which inspired a surprising discovery in Haqaq, Chapter 29), or Otto Van Veen’s seventeenth-century painting depicting Amazons uniting with the Scythians because they agreed to let them continue to live with them as independent warriors, or Van Veen’s painting The Persian Women, who expose their sex to the returning warriors of a losing a battle, telling them they can’t possibly return from where they came (from An Evening, Chapter 32), as well as variations on the golden section, a geometric form found throughout the natural world (from O Topico, Chapter 27). These subjects find a counterpoint in thirty two works painted specially for the occasion.

Still, this isn’t an artistic-biography show. The Sun Does Not Move. Chapter 35 is primarily a spatial and visual trap set by Quaytman for our looking habits, and the dense web of artistic, historical, and topographic references surrounding it has one purpose: to make visible the mechanisms that construct the image and our seeing.

Jarosław Suchan

Link: R.H. Quaytman at Museum Sztuki

Share: Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest